Re: Why people are not switching to Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, kendell clark <coffeekingms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> hi
> I agree with this but at the same time I disagree. I completely agree
> that installing codecs should be easier. On the other hand, I'm
> sympothetic to fedora's awkward position. If they made installing
> these codecs easier or installed them by default, even though the
> software to play them is open source, they could find themselves on
> the bad end of an  riaa or mpaa lawsuit.

Nope. Neither of those entities own codec patents.
And no its not "impossible" to ship those codes in a legal way.
If fedora/red hat would buy patent licenses they can legally
distribute those codes *but* those licenses would not apply to remixes
so anyone else basing his/her distro on fedora would have to either
remove them or get a patent license.
MP3 will expire soon anyway. So we'd only need AAC/H264 to be able to
handle most videos out there.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux