Re: Do we really need LibreOffice installed by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 09/19/2014 02:22 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Alberto Ruiz <aruiz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems to me that having third party extensions silently failing to
save a dozen megs might not be worth it. If we're talking about 200megs
on the other hand...

What extensions do we ship with LibreOffice that requires Java? If
they are third-party and upstream doesn't compel to include them by
default do we really need them.

Third party LibreOffice extensions are something that upstream by design does not include---they e.g. cover functionality that is deemed too specialized to warrant general inclusion. And we as Fedora don't ship them either---they're an area where repackaging as RPMs probably doesn't make sense, at least not exclusively.

(Related to the question of how much space would be saved by dropping java-headless, LO's move from depending java to java-headless wasn't so much motivated by space savings but rather to work around "Java package [...] launchers we don't want to have in our default install," <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131425>.)

(And, just to be clear, LO works with whatever JRE's available at runtime, OpenJDK, Oracle, even GCJ still.)

Stephan
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux