-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/2014 08:31 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josh Boyer > <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Stephen Gallagher >> <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 01/29/2014 08:08 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 04:59 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: >>>>>> 2) What is the actual deliverable and delivery mechanism >>>>>> for Workstation? >>>>>> >>>>>> This is asking how we intend to ship the Workstation >>>>>> product. ISO, live USB image, something else? >>>>> >>>>> There is no plan to change this from what has been the >>>>> primary delivery methods of Fedora so far. That said I >>>>> think the emphasis will need to change where a USB sticks >>>>> is the primary medium and DVDs the secondary. >>>> >>>> Two notes in this regard: >>>> >>>> 1) If we are going the USB way (which I think is the way to >>>> go as many laptops are removing CD/DVD and we also save some >>>> trees in the meantime), we should look at ways to improve the >>>> USB creation experience and documetnation wrt to the current >>>> state. I would make it a priority to focus on making it >>>> specially easy for Windows and Mac OS X users. >>>> >>>> 2) I would remove the DVD install-only option. Focusing only >>>> the installable Live media. The reason for this suggestion is >>>> that it would remove the amount of media we have to test and >>>> release and that it will reduce that confusing choice for >>>> users (if you're new it's hard to figure out which option is >>>> best or whether it matters at all). >>>> >>> >>> I'd be very wary of doing this. The big problem with the live >>> install option is that it's highly limited in the storage >>> configurations it can use. There will certainly be users out >>> there who will want to install Fedora Workstation on systems >>> with complicated storage setups. The live media probably won't >>> work for them. >> >> How relevant to Workstation is that? > > It isn't because the Live Install no longer does the "dd image to > disk" thing but just creates partitons, mounts and copies the > data. So there is no limit to storage configuration I know of. > Hmm, I must have missed that we're no longer doing that. So the "install from live image" now has full access to the anaconda storage manager? If that's the case, I withdraw my concerns. > Stephen anything specific that does not work for you using live? > Truthfully, I haven't installed from live media since around F16. I always install with the net iso. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLpBVgACgkQeiVVYja6o6OR8gCfbnG8yB3tZrzrE0g7OHcYGODg dJsAniFTDeAUNP30X5pEsVfsFCvKWkX2 =720t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
