Re: Workstation PRD approval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:01:46AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:

> So as I stated before and which also the PRD stated, we do hope that 
> the workstation becomes a solid and nice desktop that a lot of people 
> can like and want to use, because at the end of the day all users, 
> developer or others, want the same baseline, a stable and well working 
> system. But I think the crucial thing here is that the goal of the new 
> products is not to just be the traditional Fedora packaging effort, 
> but to be actual development targets where at least Red Hat plans to 
> put paid time on developing these features. And thus putting in 
> 'general users' as a usecase doesn't make sense to me here, because as 
> much as we all here would love to see 2014 be the year of the linux 
> desktop, that is very unlikely to happen just because we general users 
> it in the PRD.

The aim of the PRD is to describe the product that we are developing. It 
is a requirement that the product we develop be usable as a general 
purpose desktop, as otherwise aproximately nobody is going to use it. 
Therefore, the PRD must discuss the requirements of a usable general 
purpose desktop.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux