Or you could assume that it is included in the developer usecase, because focusing on the developer usecase in a way that makes no developer want to use the system is actually the opposite of focusing on the developer usecase. Christian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" <desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 2:53:18 PM Subject: Re: Workstation PRD approval On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:51:13AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: > Ok, so looking over this it seems the primary change you made was replace the use cases, with the first use case being 'general user'? Is that truly useful usecase to call out? Prioritizing something to target 'everyone' isn't really prioritization at all. Yes, it's a vital use case to call out, because it covers the set of behaviour that almost everyone who uses the Workstation product will require. If we concentrate on improving the developer experience to the exclusion of caring about the general user case, no developers are actually going to bother with Fedora. They'll just use OS X instead, because it'll be a nicer desktop OS and almost as good a development environment. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
