On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > So the two main areas for sysadmins you highlighted were multiple > monitor support, and handling large numbers of terminal windows. > Those are already addressed as things Workstation is looking at in the > Other users section, but it seems they actually fit into at least the > 'corporate developer' user case as well. I'd suggest moving those two > specific items into one of those other user cases as a starting point > and move on from there. *nod* > I'm not sure targeting sysadmins specifically is something Workstation > can focus on, because their needs often get into specific areas that > aren't really what Workstation is for. Things like admin tools, etc. > However, we can certainly try and address the more general needs from > a sysadmin group, and of course we can (and should) solicit feedback > from them as we go. Yeah, I hear the point about not developing or focusing on admin tools. I just don't want to send the message that the new main Fedora desktop offering is intended to be exclusionary of feedback from our technical users, and sysadmins in particular (because that group is important to the whole Fedora ecosystem!). That would be the opposite of what we were talking about at Flock when Stephen brought the idea. The developer targets certainly have some overlap, and as I understand the PRD they're not meant to be exclusionary, so I think it's overall good even if it's not exactly what I personally would want. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
