On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:57 -0500, xiphmont@xxxxxxxx wrote: > On 2/27/07, David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:38 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > > A user logged in twice would hand > > > > both sessions full access. > > > > > > Yup. > > > > Well actually, the answer here is: it depends. For things like > > multi-seat you probably assign one sound card soundA to seat1 and > > another sound card soundB to seat2. So if user is logged in twice at > > seat1 he still don't have access to soundB. > > I know you didn't *say* LTSP.... Some estimates out there put GNOME on LTSP as having double-digits market shares of all GNOME deployments. IIRC about 37%. I don't have any links to back this up right now though. It's kinda funny, you're very defensive about keeping compat etc, but seem to ignore "pet projects" like f-u-s, multi-seat and LTSP... anyway... > But seriously, how is that currently done with, say, two webcams? ConsoleKit knows about Sessions and Seats. HAL will assign ACL's based on this. It needs a bit more work (definition of seats and what devices belongs to what seats etc.) so not going to happen for F7. There's also the X.org and Linux VT subsystem to keep in mind. But it's not really hard. FWIW, it came up last week on GNOME's desktop-devel-list http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-February/msg00290.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-February/msg00291.html David -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
