On ÑÑÐ, 2004-09-07 at 13:12 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote: > Bugzilla is possibly a better place for that as it doesn't get lost. In this case discussion around the bug can be focussed here. Create an RFE - link to the screenshots on a website somewhere and table the discussion. > > > what i'm all talking about :) if that turns out to be ok, i _WILL_ > > improve apacheconf UI, and all other fedora sys tools that use glade, > > then i can move to those that don't (i'm also a programmer:) > > It'd be helpful for you to share on common issues, etc in addition to posting > patches/new glade files. To ensure future development is more HIG aware. Your > help/patches are welcome, hopefully we could document some of this up into a > smaller Fedora s-c-foo HIG gotchas doc or something. > > Paul > this is current apacheconf http://www.gnome-ppp.org/fedora/apache- conf.old.png this is what i would start doing http://www.gnome- ppp.org/fedora/apache-conf.hig.png first, change all glade ui's to hig compliance, and then we can seat and talk to make some string more human. bye, vladeck. -- "There's no room for ideals in this mechanical place. There has to be passion. " -- Fedora-config-list mailing list Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list