On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:30:44PM +0200, Vladimir Djokic wrote: > On ÑÑÐ, 2004-09-07 at 08:39 -0500, jck wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 11:14 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote: > > > May i ask what is still missing and what exactly you want to do? I'm > > > always very happy when someone wants to work on the UI, i just want to > > > understand if the HIG changed yet again or if there was something > > > missing in the last triage. > > My triage was a good starting point, but I think it definitely needs > > more work. Vladimir, if you'd like to work on this with me, I'd love to > > get back into working on further HIG-ifying the system-config tools. > > > > Email me off list and we'll bug Phil when we've got a new glade file for > > him. :-) > i've already sent proposal (2 small screenshots), but i'm waiting for > moderators approval the send the mail to this list. there you can see Bugzilla is possibly a better place for that as it doesn't get lost. In this case discussion around the bug can be focussed here. Create an RFE - link to the screenshots on a website somewhere and table the discussion. > what i'm all talking about :) if that turns out to be ok, i _WILL_ > improve apacheconf UI, and all other fedora sys tools that use glade, > then i can move to those that don't (i'm also a programmer:) It'd be helpful for you to share on common issues, etc in addition to posting patches/new glade files. To ensure future development is more HIG aware. Your help/patches are welcome, hopefully we could document some of this up into a smaller Fedora s-c-foo HIG gotchas doc or something. Paul -- Fedora-config-list mailing list Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list