Re: [Fedora-config-list] HIG Work on apacheconf glade file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 19:12, Brent Fox wrote:

> Please file a bugzilla entry and attach it there.  Please post the bug
> report number to the list as well.

Done!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110494

I'm a little confused/concerned, though.  I did "diff -u old-file
new-file > patch.diff" and I got a 600K file.  The two files themselves,
the new and old glade files, don't even total 600K!  Did I do anything
wrong here, or is diff just being strange?

> It would be nice if we could HIG-ify the tools for FC2.  If anyone
> wants to start looking at making other tools HIG compliant, feel free.

I'd definitely like to help with this.  I'll keep banging on s-c-httpd
for now, and move on to the other tools as I have time...  it's not
terribly hard - I might have them all done myself relatively quickly.

The real challenge, naturally, is not just pixel tweaking, label
changing, and other small polishing moves.  These do make a big
difference, but the biggest changes in usability will have to be more
significant to make the tools a little more usable and useful.  I have
my sights set on s-c-services after the tools have basic HIG work done
(spacings, orderings, etc) - I've got a couple nice ideas for it.

Thanks for the quick feedback - it definitely encourages participation.
:)

 - jck

-- 
"To turn $100 into $110 is work. To turn $100 million into $110 million
is inevitable"
 -- Edgar Bronfman




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]