Re: [Fedora-config-list] HIG Work on apacheconf glade file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:56:09PM -0600, Jens Knutson wrote:
> Hello, all...
> 
> I've done a bunch of cleanup on apacheconf's glade file to make it more
> HIG compliant.  Should I just attach it as a diff to a bugzilla entry?

Please file a bugzilla entry and attach it there.  Please post the bug
report number to the list as well.

It would be nice if we could HIG-ify the tools for FC2.  If anyone
wants to start looking at making other tools HIG compliant, feel free.
It seems like this would be a good place to start getting the
participation process going.  Making the tools HIG compliant will
probably require a large number of small changes, most of which should
be pretty simple from a coding standpoint.


Cheers,
   Brent

> 
> Anyhow, this is a summary of the changes, and along with a couple
> questions I have:
> 
> Overall:
> ==========
> 
> * I only touched the small dialogs for now - I don't want to bother with
> the larger main and vhost dialogs if you don't like what I'm doing. ;)
> * All separators between the contents of a window and the button boxes
> have been removed, per the HIG
> * All spacings and borders have been corrected for HIG compliance
> * Button orderings have also all been corrected per the HIG
> * when fixing their order, I also gave OK and Cancel buttons proper
> names (ie: "button28" became "error_document_dialog_ok_button")
> * changed all instances of icky old question mark icon, like in the
> vhost_alias_dialog, to use the stock gnome question icon
> 
> 
> error_document_dialog:
> 
> * fixed "Location" label by adding colon, to read "Location:"
> 
> 
> 
> Questions:
> =============
> 
> * I wanted to put the label in the default_directory_options_dialog
> above where the checkboxes would go, but I didn't want to screw anything
> up.  Can I change this stuff without causing code problems?  I'm not a
> coder, so I wasn't sure about this...
> 
> * Also, in the default_directory_options_dialog, and other places, why
> aren't the standard GtkCheckboxes being used?  Just curious... :)
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>  - jck
> 
> -- 
> "To turn $100 into $110 is work. To turn $100 million into $110 million
> is inevitable"
>  -- Edgar Bronfman
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora-config-list mailing list
> Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]