On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 02:21, Jens Knutson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 03:38, Phil Knirsch wrote: > > > * Also, in the default_directory_options_dialog, and other places, why > > > aren't the standard GtkCheckboxes being used? Just curious... :) > > > > Hm, what do you mean? It may be because of the nice check sign we use. ;-) > > Here's a quick page showing the difference: > > http://upevil.net/temp/checkboxes.html > > See what I mean? I was just wondering why those seemingly non-standard > checkboxes were used. Seems like extra visual noise and code complexity > for nothing, but perhaps I'm missing something. :) It goes back to the days of gtk+ 1.2 when we had better reason for such things. With gtk+ 2, there's not really a good reason that I know of to keep the hack checkboxes (eg, we got rid of them in anaconda ;) Cheers, Jeremy