> Implementing the install/remove/update by package interface for yum is > pretty straight forward. The group interface is proving much more > difficult. The problem lies in the fact that comps and rhpl.comps use > rpmheaders while yum works with nevral to keep track of the packages. > huh? Why is this a difference? Yum can represent packages as just name. That's one of the reasons why there is that storage option in the nevral. Heck, the groups support is already IN yum now. I didn't have to cause any magic to make that work. -sv