Le vendredi 25 mai 2007 à 16:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 22:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le vendredi 25 mai 2007 à 15:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > > > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:16 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So using them systematically is not reflecting the project state > > > > accurately, and it will hurt the local Fedora groups when they try to > > > > localise Fedora marketing material and discover their language is just > > > > not supported. > > > > > > This is indeed a valid point, and you should have mentioned that concern > > > in your first mail. > > > > I though I did. "they lack extended glyph coverage". Maybe too technical > > for every reader on this list but certainly not too technical for you. > > I might have picked it up, but you muddied the waters with a reference > to default fonts... So? Are you suggesting it would be a good thing if CD/DVD look diverged significantly from the Fedora desktop ones? We sync the sleeve decorations and colours with the release default background. Why should we not sync the sleeve fonts with the default desktop fonts? Fonts contribute to the theming too. Moreover the desktop and art team have mostly the same font constraints (put FLOSS projects first, provide readable text to the same users with the same langages & scripts, etc). So distribution font choices are certainly relevant to the art team. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
