On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:55 -0400, Diana Fong wrote: > Thanks...I think for now, I'll just name it as you have there. I was > thinking that it might have a "battery-" prefix...but I guess that is > easy enough to change once more of the naming spec is decided on. I'll > also supply the battery-caution/low to satisfy those slots as well. Well, I did originally have battery-*, but without being in the spec, a name clash seemed inevitable. Hence the gpm-* prefix. > Richard could you send us a note if/when names are decided/changed and > if more battery states are added? Will do. I'll not add anymore in the 2.15/2.16 timeframe if that helps. Richard. _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
