Thanks...I think for now, I'll just name it as you have there. I was
thinking that it might have a "battery-" prefix...but I guess that is
easy enough to change once more of the naming spec is decided on. I'll
also supply the battery-caution/low to satisfy those slots as well.
Richard could you send us a note if/when names are decided/changed and
if more battery states are added?
Thanks
Diana
David Zeuthen wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 08:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
Lastly...I've made battery icons for PowerManager but the naming scheme
is nowhere to be found on Tango. I was pointed to [3] but the names
seems different to what might fit in the Tango naming scheme.
Yes, I'm pretty sure Richard Hughes, g-p-m maintainer, will refuse to
cripple his software just becase the icon-naming-spec maintainer has
this odd idea that only 'battery-caution', 'battery-low' and 'battery'
should be used by g-p-m. I could be wrong (hope I'm not!), so I've Cc'ed
Richard on this mail - Richard, can you confirm that g-p-m will stick to
the gpm-* icons you already use?
Ohh yes. I ship tango-style icons by default, but don't touch the ones
in the icons naming spec. There just isn't enough power icons in the
spec. The g-p-m icons are all prefixed with gpm- for clarity.
For reference, these are the icons I use:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/gnome-power-manager/docs/icon-scheme.html
Thanks for the quick reply Richard!
David
_______________________________________________
@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
