On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:50 -0400, Diana Fong wrote: > I thought at 24x24, the perspective and shadow still held pretty well. > I've attached a portion of the screenshot mockups I've posted earlier to > the wiki. It is the earlier version to assess the feasibility of the > project. > > From David Neilsen's emails about sizes, I thought maybe the 24x24 > should be simplified as well...but...as I look back and forth between > the two...I'm not really convinced. I might also be staring at this > stuff for much too long so...I'll just post the other version here for > discussion. > > My feedback on the matter is...24x24 should remain in perspective, 16x16 > definitely simplified and "flat". However there are also 18 and 22 > sizes...22 are usually used in the panel area. In the attached mockup > are also a few 22x22 icons on the upper right area of the panel. > Dunno...I think they look ok as well. Maybe the break down point is > then at 18? Well the office icon seems somewhat ambiguous, possibly making the pen container somewhat bigger would help, also adding a slight outline would help in my opinion. Generally they don't look too bad, the rest are identifiable as to what they are supposed to be. Paul _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
