Em Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:17:27PM +0000, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On 2/14/19 4:47 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > I wonder if we should have a libbtf, with the same licensing as libbpf, > > as, for instance, pahole would be interested only in the btf parts, be > > it encoding, loading and pretty printing. > > I don't think it's possible to do such split. > .btf.ext section only makes sense together with bpf prog. Well, that part, that is not about types and only makes sense together with the BPF parts could stay in libbpf, no? - Arnaldo
