On 2/14/19 4:47 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > I wonder if we should have a libbtf, with the same licensing as libbpf, > as, for instance, pahole would be interested only in the btf parts, be > it encoding, loading and pretty printing. I don't think it's possible to do such split. .btf.ext section only makes sense together with bpf prog.
