On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100 > Steven Newbury <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Would gles1 be sufficient to run a Wayland compositor, I'm > > guessing probably not..? > > If you can find a Wayland compositor that is written to composite > with > GLES1, that's all you need from the "Wayland side". (Yeah, this has > nothing to do with Wayland per se.) Compositing in itself without any > effects is very simple, as long as you get the textures up. > > Or, if you find a Wayland compositor written to use desktop OpenGL > for > compositing and does not use features your GL driver does not expose, > that's good too. > Is desktop OpenGL accessible from "EGL_PLATFORM=drm"? > Absolutely nothing about Wayland limits your choice of the GL > flavour - > even more so as the compositor is not running *on* Wayland. > > Also, the question of running GL apps on Wayland is a whole another > matter. There used to be a common misconception that Wayland had > something to do with only allowing GLES. > > Finally, there is the option of software rendering for composition... > Well, considering I was wondering about running Wayland on ancient hardware, perhaps software compositing wouldn't be ideal! ;-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
