On Thu, 04 Apr 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3/19/2024 3:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> An Adaptive-Sync-capable DP protocol converter indicates its >>>> support by setting the related bit in the DPCD register. This >>>> is valid for DP and edp as well. >>>> >>>> Computes AS SDP values based on the display configuration, >>>> ensuring proper handling of Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) >>>> in the context of Adaptive Sync. >>> [snip] >>> >>>> Mitul Golani (9): >>>> drm/dp: Add support to indicate if sink supports AS SDP >>>> drm: Add Adaptive Sync SDP logging >>> Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these two patches via >>> drm-intel-next? >> Ack >> >> Maxime > > Thanks for the patch, ack and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next. This came up again today [1]. The acks absolutely must be recorded in the commit messages when pushing the patches. dim should complain about applying non-i915 patches without acks. BR, Jani. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zh_Q72gYKMMbge9A@xxxxxxxxx -- Jani Nikula, Intel