On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 03:35:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/19/2024 3:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> An Adaptive-Sync-capable DP protocol converter indicates its > >>>> support by setting the related bit in the DPCD register. This > >>>> is valid for DP and edp as well. > >>>> > >>>> Computes AS SDP values based on the display configuration, > >>>> ensuring proper handling of Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) > >>>> in the context of Adaptive Sync. > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>>> Mitul Golani (9): > >>>> drm/dp: Add support to indicate if sink supports AS SDP > >>>> drm: Add Adaptive Sync SDP logging > >>> Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these two patches via > >>> drm-intel-next? > >> Ack > >> > >> Maxime > > > > Thanks for the patch, ack and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next. > > This came up again today [1]. The acks absolutely must be recorded in > the commit messages when pushing the patches. > > dim should complain about applying non-i915 patches without acks. It doesn't at the moment, this has bitten us a couple of times in drm-misc too. I did a MR to address that that hasn't been reviewed yet: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools/-/merge_requests/40 Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
