On 4/19/2024 6:05 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/19/2024 3:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An Adaptive-Sync-capable DP protocol converter indicates its
support by setting the related bit in the DPCD register. This
is valid for DP and edp as well.
Computes AS SDP values based on the display configuration,
ensuring proper handling of Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
in the context of Adaptive Sync.
[snip]
Mitul Golani (9):
drm/dp: Add support to indicate if sink supports AS SDP
drm: Add Adaptive Sync SDP logging
Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these two patches via
drm-intel-next?
Ack
Maxime
Thanks for the patch, ack and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next.
This came up again today [1]. The acks absolutely must be recorded in
the commit messages when pushing the patches.
I apologize for the oversight. Moving forward, I will ensure to
consistently include the "acked-by" tag when pushing such changes.
Regards,
Ankit
dim should complain about applying non-i915 patches without acks.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zh_Q72gYKMMbge9A@xxxxxxxxx
