On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 23:48, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2023 1:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 23:32, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2023 1:31 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 23:16, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/8/2023 3:19 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 07:07, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add CDM blocks to the sc7280 dpu_hw_catalog to support
> >>>>>> YUV format output from writeback block.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> changes in v2:
> >>>>>> - remove explicit zero assignment for features
> >>>>>> - move sc7280_cdm to dpu_hw_catalog from the sc7280
> >>>>>> catalog file as its definition can be re-used
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h | 1 +
> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 5 +++++
> >>>>>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> >>>>>> index 209675de6742..19c2b7454796 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> >>>>>> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc7280_cfg = {
> >>>>>> .mdss_ver = &sc7280_mdss_ver,
> >>>>>> .caps = &sc7280_dpu_caps,
> >>>>>> .mdp = &sc7280_mdp,
> >>>>>> + .cdm = &sc7280_cdm,
> >>>>>> .ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_ctl),
> >>>>>> .ctl = sc7280_ctl,
> >>>>>> .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_sspp),
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> >>>>>> index d52aae54bbd5..1be3156cde05 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> >>>>>> @@ -426,6 +426,16 @@ static const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks dsc_sblk_1 = {
> >>>>>> .ctl = {.name = "ctl", .base = 0xF80, .len = 0x10},
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +/*************************************************************
> >>>>>> + * CDM sub block config
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nit: it is not a subblock config.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ack.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> + *************************************************************/
> >>>>>> +static const struct dpu_cdm_cfg sc7280_cdm = {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know that I have r-b'ed this patch. But then one thing occurred to
> >>>>> me. If this definition is common to all (or almost all) platforms, can
> >>>>> we just call it dpu_cdm or dpu_common_cdm?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> + .name = "cdm_0",
> >>>>>> + .id = CDM_0,
> >>>>>> + .len = 0x228,
> >>>>>> + .base = 0x79200,
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>
> >>>> hmmm .... almost common but not entirely ... msm8998's CDM has a shorter
> >>>> len of 0x224 :(
> >>>
> >>> Then sdm845_cdm?
> >>>
> >>
> >> That also has a shorter cdm length.
> >
> > Could you please clarify. According to the downstream DT files all CDM
> > blocks up to (but not including) sm8550 had length 0x224. SM8550 and
> > SM8650 got qcom,sde-cdm-size = <0x220>. But I don't see any registers
> > after 0x204.
> >>
>
> We always list 0x4 more than the last offset.
Yes, so this makes it correct for several latest DT files, which have
qcom,sde-cdm-size = <0x220>.
However all the previous DT files (from msm8998 to sm8450) had
qcom,sde-cdm-size = <0x224>;
>
> In chipsets sdm845 and msm8998, I only see the last offset of CDM as
> 0x220 but in sm8250 and sc7280, the last offset is 0x224. Hence the
> total length is more in sc7280/sm8250 as compared to sdm845/msm8998.
>
> I didnt follow that you do not see any registers after 0x204.
>
> The CDM_MUX is the last offset which has an offset 0x224 from the base
> address. So thats the last offset.
Ack
>
> The newer chipsets have CDM_MUX and the older ones did not. Hence the
> difference in length.
>
> >> BTW, sdm845 is not in this series. It will be part of RFT as we discussed.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> /*************************************************************
> >>>>>> * VBIF sub blocks config
> >>>>>> *************************************************************/
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> >>>>>> index e3c0d007481b..ba82ef4560a6 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> >>>>>> @@ -682,6 +682,17 @@ struct dpu_vbif_cfg {
> >>>>>> u32 memtype[MAX_XIN_COUNT];
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>> + * struct dpu_cdm_cfg - information of chroma down blocks
> >>>>>> + * @name string name for debug purposes
> >>>>>> + * @id enum identifying this block
> >>>>>> + * @base register offset of this block
> >>>>>> + * @features bit mask identifying sub-blocks/features
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> +struct dpu_cdm_cfg {
> >>>>>> + DPU_HW_BLK_INFO;
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> /**
> >>>>>> * Define CDP use cases
> >>>>>> * @DPU_PERF_CDP_UDAGE_RT: real-time use cases
> >>>>>> @@ -805,6 +816,8 @@ struct dpu_mdss_cfg {
> >>>>>> u32 wb_count;
> >>>>>> const struct dpu_wb_cfg *wb;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> + const struct dpu_cdm_cfg *cdm;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> u32 ad_count;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> u32 dspp_count;
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> >>>>>> index a6702b2bfc68..f319c8232ea5 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> >>>>>> @@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ enum dpu_dsc {
> >>>>>> DSC_MAX
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +enum dpu_cdm {
> >>>>>> + CDM_0 = 1,
> >>>>>> + CDM_MAX
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> enum dpu_pingpong {
> >>>>>> PINGPONG_NONE,
> >>>>>> PINGPONG_0,
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.40.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
