On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 07:07, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add CDM blocks to the sc7280 dpu_hw_catalog to support
> YUV format output from writeback block.
>
> changes in v2:
> - remove explicit zero assignment for features
> - move sc7280_cdm to dpu_hw_catalog from the sc7280
> catalog file as its definition can be re-used
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 5 +++++
> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> index 209675de6742..19c2b7454796 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc7280_cfg = {
> .mdss_ver = &sc7280_mdss_ver,
> .caps = &sc7280_dpu_caps,
> .mdp = &sc7280_mdp,
> + .cdm = &sc7280_cdm,
> .ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_ctl),
> .ctl = sc7280_ctl,
> .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_sspp),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index d52aae54bbd5..1be3156cde05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -426,6 +426,16 @@ static const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks dsc_sblk_1 = {
> .ctl = {.name = "ctl", .base = 0xF80, .len = 0x10},
> };
>
> +/*************************************************************
> + * CDM sub block config
Nit: it is not a subblock config.
> + *************************************************************/
> +static const struct dpu_cdm_cfg sc7280_cdm = {
I know that I have r-b'ed this patch. But then one thing occurred to
me. If this definition is common to all (or almost all) platforms, can
we just call it dpu_cdm or dpu_common_cdm?
> + .name = "cdm_0",
> + .id = CDM_0,
> + .len = 0x228,
> + .base = 0x79200,
> +};
> +
> /*************************************************************
> * VBIF sub blocks config
> *************************************************************/
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index e3c0d007481b..ba82ef4560a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -682,6 +682,17 @@ struct dpu_vbif_cfg {
> u32 memtype[MAX_XIN_COUNT];
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct dpu_cdm_cfg - information of chroma down blocks
> + * @name string name for debug purposes
> + * @id enum identifying this block
> + * @base register offset of this block
> + * @features bit mask identifying sub-blocks/features
> + */
> +struct dpu_cdm_cfg {
> + DPU_HW_BLK_INFO;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * Define CDP use cases
> * @DPU_PERF_CDP_UDAGE_RT: real-time use cases
> @@ -805,6 +816,8 @@ struct dpu_mdss_cfg {
> u32 wb_count;
> const struct dpu_wb_cfg *wb;
>
> + const struct dpu_cdm_cfg *cdm;
> +
> u32 ad_count;
>
> u32 dspp_count;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> index a6702b2bfc68..f319c8232ea5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ enum dpu_dsc {
> DSC_MAX
> };
>
> +enum dpu_cdm {
> + CDM_0 = 1,
> + CDM_MAX
> +};
> +
> enum dpu_pingpong {
> PINGPONG_NONE,
> PINGPONG_0,
> --
> 2.40.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
