Re: [PATCH 0/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add missing simple-framebuffer features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:38:31AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:38:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> This contains two patches that bring simplefb up to feature parity with
> >> simpledrm. The patches add support for the "memory-region" property that
> >> provides an alternative to the "reg" property to describe the memory
> >> used for the framebuffer and allow attaching the simple-framebuffer
> >> device to one or more generic power domains to make sure they aren't
> >> turned off during the boot process and take down the display
> >> configuration.
> >
> > I just talked with Sima about it in the hallway at XDC. I'm fine with
> > those patches in principle, but it looks to me that simpledrm doesn't
> > have support for power domains and we'll want that :)
> >
> 
> It has support since commit 61df9ca23107 ("drm/simpledrm: Add support for
> multiple "power-domains") AFAIK.

Ah, my bad I didn't look in drm-misc-next

All good then, thanks!
Maxime




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux