On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 01:51:59PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > > > On 19/10/2023 06:46, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Flaky tests can be very difficult to reproduce after the facts, which > > will make it even harder to ever fix. > > > > Let's document the metadata we agreed on to provide more context to > > anyone trying to address these fixes. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAPj87rPbJ1V1-R7WMTHkDat2A4nwSd61Df9mdGH2PR=ZzxaU=Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst | 13 +++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst b/Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst > > index 469b6fb65c30..2dd0e221c2c3 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/automated_testing.rst > > @@ -67,6 +67,19 @@ Lists the tests that for a given driver on a specific hardware revision are > > known to behave unreliably. These tests won't cause a job to fail regardless of > > the result. They will still be run. > > +Each new flake entry must be associated with a link to a bug report to > > What do you mean by but report? Just a link to an email to the mailing list > is enough? Yes, a mail to the maintainers of that driver is enough. Waiting for an actual fix would take too long, but at least that way we have the opportunity to come back later on and see if there's progress. > Also, I had made a mistake to the first flakes lists, which I corrected with > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4959629.html (there was a bug in my > script which ended up erroneous adding a bunch of tests in the flake list, > so I cleaned them up), I would like to kind request to let me add those > documentation in a future patch to not block that patch series. Sounds fair, especially since you remove a significant number of them Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
