Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hello Maxime,
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:38:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> This contains two patches that bring simplefb up to feature parity with
>> simpledrm. The patches add support for the "memory-region" property that
>> provides an alternative to the "reg" property to describe the memory
>> used for the framebuffer and allow attaching the simple-framebuffer
>> device to one or more generic power domains to make sure they aren't
>> turned off during the boot process and take down the display
>> configuration.
>
> I just talked with Sima about it in the hallway at XDC. I'm fine with
> those patches in principle, but it looks to me that simpledrm doesn't
> have support for power domains and we'll want that :)
>
It has support since commit 61df9ca23107 ("drm/simpledrm: Add support for
multiple "power-domains") AFAIK.
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
