Hi Peter, > > Ok, I'll keep your use-case in mind but AFAICS, the process that creates > > the udmabuf can be considered the owner. So, I think it makes sense that > > the owner's VMA range can be registered (via mmu_notifiers) for updates. > > No need to have your special attention on this; my use case is not anything > useful with details, just wanted to show the idea that virtual address > range based notification might not work. > > [...] > > > What limitation do you see with the usage of mmu notifiers for this use- > case? > > And, if using mmu notifiers is not the right approach, how do you suggest > we > > can solve this problem? > > AFAIU, even if there'll be a notification chanism, it needs to be at least > in per-file address space (probably in file offsets) rather than per-mm for > a shmem backend, so that any mapping of the file should notify that. Yes, it makes sense that the notification in this case is a combination of (mapping, offset). Not sure how challenging it'd be to add such a notification mechanism that would be per-file address space. However, as discussed earlier with Alistair, it appears there is some value in having something similar with mmu notifiers: mmu_notifier_update_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address) And, in the callback, we could get the new page either using hmm_range_fault() or through the page cache as we get notified after the PTE gets updated: mapoff = linear_page_index(vma, address); new_page = find_get_page(vma->vm_file->f_mapping, mapoff); > > Isn't it already too late though to wait that notification until page is > installed? Because here you pinned the page for DMA, I think it means > before a new page installed (but after the page is invalidated) the device > can DMA to an invalid buffer. The page is only invalidated in the memfd. Until the hole is written to, we (udmabuf) can choose to handle any reads (or DMA) using old pages if needed. > > To come back to the original question: I don't know how that could work at > all, the userapp should just never do that invalidation, because right > after it does, the dma buffer will be invalid, and the device can update > data into trash. So.. I don't have an easy way to do this right.. besides > disabling ram discard just like what vfio does already. Yeah, disabling ram discard is the last option if we cannot find a way to safely get notified about mapping updates. Thanks, Vivek > > Thanks, > > -- > Peter Xu >
