Hi,
On 2023/5/22 18:05, WANG Xuerui wrote:
On 2023/5/22 17:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2023/5/22 17:28, WANG Xuerui wrote:
On 2023/5/22 17:25, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2023/5/21 20:21, WANG Xuerui wrote:
+ * LS3A4000/LS3A5000/LS3A6000 CPU, they are equipped with
on-board video RAM
+ * typically. While LS2K0500/LS2K1000/LS2K2000 are low cost SoCs
which share
+ * the system RAM as video RAM, they don't has a dediacated VRAM.
CPU models are not typically prefixed with "LS", so "Loongson
3A4000/3A5000/3A6000".
Here is because when you do programming, variable name should
prefix with letters.
Commit messages, comments, and log messages etc. are natural
language, so it's better to treat them differently. No problem to
keep code as-is IMO.
Then you get two name for a single chip, take LS7A1000 as an example.
You name it as Loongson 7A1000 in commit message, and then you have
to define another name in the code, say LS7A1000.
"Loongson 7A1000" is too long, not as compact as LS7A1000.
This also avoid bind the company name to a specific product, because
a company can produce many product.
Nah, the existing convention is "LS7Xxxxx" for bridges
But I see there are document[1] which named LS7A1000 bridge chip as
Loongson 7A1000 Bridge,
See [1] for reference, who is wrong in this case?
[1]
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/Loongson-7A1000-usermanual-EN
