On 17.11.2022 18:21, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > On 17.11.2022 17:07, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Am 17.11.22 um 13:57 schrieb Marek Szyprowski: >>> On 15.11.2022 12:58, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>>> Schedule the deferred-I/O worker instead of the damage worker after >>>> writing to the fbdev framebuffer. The deferred-I/O worker then >>>> performs >>>> the dirty-fb update. The fbdev emulation will initialize deferred I/O >>>> for all drivers that require damage updates. It is therefore a valid >>>> assumption that the deferred-I/O worker is present. >>>> >>>> It would be possible to perform the damage handling directly from >>>> within >>>> the write operation. But doing this could increase the overhead of the >>>> write or interfere with a concurrently scheduled deferred-I/O worker. >>>> Instead, scheduling the deferred-I/O worker with its regular delay of >>>> 50 ms removes load off the write operation and allows the deferred-I/O >>>> worker to handle multiple write operations that arrived during the >>>> delay >>>> time window. >>>> >>>> v2: >>>> * keep drm_fb_helper_damage() (Daniel) >>>> * use fb_deferred_io_schedule_flush() (Daniel) >>>> * clarify comments (Daniel) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This patch, merged into today's linux-next as commit 7f5cc4a3e5e4 >>> ("drm/fb-helper: Schedule deferred-I/O worker after writing to >>> framebuffer"), triggers a following warning on Raspberry Pi 3 & 4 as >>> well as all Amlogic Meson G12A/B based boards: >>> >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 220 at drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c:340 >> >> Thank you so much for reporting. That line should never be executed >> with vc4 et al. >> >> If you have the time, could you please try the attached patch and >> report the results. Thanks a lot. > > This fixes the issue observed on my Raspberry Pi 3/4 and Amlogic Meson > based boards. Feel free to add: > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> Gentle ping. This issue is not fixed in linux-next. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland