On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors
twice.
In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2:
1. Rebase
2. Add Steven's review
Changes since v1:
1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init()
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi Rob, Tomeu and Steven,
You're listed as maintainers for panfrost. Is anyone going to pick this
up?
I'm only a reviewer so I've been leaving it for Rob or Tomeu, but I can
pick it up if Rob/Tomeu are happy for me to do that.
Maybe I sent it to wrong mailing list or forgot about anything?
No, there's actually a few Panfrost commits waiting, it was on my todo
list to ask if Rob/Tomeu needed some help with merging patches.
Steve
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
