There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors
twice.
In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2:
1. Rebase
2. Add Steven's review
Changes since v1:
1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init()
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
index 8136babd3ba9..b172087eee6a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c
@@ -101,7 +101,9 @@ static int panfrost_regulator_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
pfdev->comp->num_supplies,
pfdev->regulators);
if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(pfdev->dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n",
+ ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -213,10 +215,8 @@ int panfrost_device_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
}
err = panfrost_regulator_init(pfdev);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(pfdev->dev, "regulator init failed %d\n", err);
+ if (err)
goto err_out0;
- }
err = panfrost_reset_init(pfdev);
if (err) {
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
