Re: Plumbing explicit synchronization through the Linux ecosystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:01 AM Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 16, 2020 5:04 PM, Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hopefully, that will provide some motivation for other compositors
> > (kwin, gnome-shell, etc.) because they now have a real user of it in
> > an upstream driver for a major desktop platform and not just a few
> > weston examples. However, someone is going to have to drive the
> > actual development in those compositors. I'd be very happy if more
> > people got involved, :-)
>
> FWIW, a wlroots pull request is in progress [0]. The plan is first to
> accept fence FDs from clients, then send them our fences as a second
> step.

What exactly are the semantics there?  Are you going to somehow wait
inside wlroots for the buffer to be 100% idle or are you expecting the
client to somehow use explicit for sending buffers implicit to wait
for idle?  If it's the latter, that's not going to work.

--Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux