On 06/04/21 10:25PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On 06/04/21 06:33PM, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > > > > On 4/6/21 6:09 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > > On 04/04/21 04:24PM, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > > >> Hi Pratyush, > > >> > > >> On 3/30/21 8:33 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > >>> The CSI2RX subsystem uses PSI-L DMA to transfer frames to memory. It can > > >>> have up to 32 threads but the current driver only supports using one. So > > >>> add an entry for that one thread. > > >> > > >> If you are absolutely sure that the other threads are not going to be > > >> used, then: > > > > > > The opposite in fact. I do expect other threads to be used in the > > > future. But the current driver can only use one so I figured it is > > > better to add just the thread that is currently needed and then I can > > > always add the rest later. > > > > > > Why does this have to be a one-and-done deal? Is there anything wrong > > > with adding the other threads when the driver can actually use them? > > > > You can skip CCing DMAengine (and me ;) ). Less subsystems is the better > > when sending patches... > > I'm a bit confused here. If you are no longer interested in maintaining > the TI DMA drivers then that's fine, I can skip CCing you. But the patch > is still relevant to the dmaengine list so why should I skip CCing it? > And if I don't CC the dmaengine list then on which list would I get > comments/reviews for the patch? Ignore this. Got your point. Will do it in v2. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav Texas Instruments Inc.
