On 04/25/2016 10:14 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 04/25/2016 02:56 PM, Christophe Varoqui wrote: > >> Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be >> removed not to confuse distributors. >> >> Distributors can't be asked to agree on a common udev ruleset. >> Ben, Hannes, Xosé, Peter are you ok with my deleting the udev rules example ? > > Fine with me. > > Btw, are these relevant ? > > getuid/usb_id Huh? What is that doing there? It should really have been moved to the udev package ... > kpartx/kpartx_id > kpartx/kpartx.rules See above. Yes, they are relevant (at least for us) > multipath/01_udev > multipath/02_multipath Not used anymore with systemd/dracut > multipath/11-dm-mpath.rules Yep. Absolutely required. > multipath.conf.annotated > multipath.conf.defaults > multipath.conf.synthetic Actually, I never saw the need for those. Can we at least have them merged? > multipathd/multipathd.init.debian > multipathd/multipathd.init.redhat > multipathd/multipathd.init.suse Old init scripts; doubtful value. > multipathd/multipathd.service > multipathd/multipathd.socket systemd service definitions. Yes, required. > multipath/multipath.init.suse Old init script; not used anymore. > multipath/multipath.rules Yep. used for udev. > multipath-tools.spec.in > Well; due to our buildservice we have to keep a separate spec file anyway. So ATM we don't use it. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
