Re: multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/25/2016 02:56 PM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:

> Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be
> removed not to confuse distributors.
> 
> Distributors can't be asked to agree on a common udev ruleset.
> Ben, Hannes, Xosé, Peter are you ok with my deleting the udev rules example ?

Fine with me.

Btw, are these relevant ?

getuid/usb_id
kpartx/kpartx_id
kpartx/kpartx.rules
multipath/01_udev
multipath/02_multipath
multipath/11-dm-mpath.rules
multipath.conf.annotated
multipath.conf.defaults
multipath.conf.synthetic
multipathd/multipathd.init.debian
multipathd/multipathd.init.redhat
multipathd/multipathd.init.suse
multipathd/multipathd.service
multipathd/multipathd.socket
multipath/multipath.init.suse
multipath/multipath.rules
multipath-tools.spec.in

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux