On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: >> Hi, >> Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be removed not >> to confuse distributors. >> Distributors can't be asked to agree on a common udev ruleset. Ben, >> Hannes, Xosé, Peter are you ok with my deleting the udev rules example ? > > I am personally fine with kpartx.rules being deleted. Red Hat doesn't > package it. > Well, we do. We use kpartx to generate partitions for multipath and dmraid, so we do need this rule. Please do not delete it; if so I will only have to re-add it again in a SUSE-specific patch. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
