On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:31:56AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > -struct dm_block; > > +#define dm_block dm_buffer > > +#define dm_block_manager dm_bufio_client > > > > But I think it'd be best, in the long run, to have a follow-on patch > > that does away with the aliases and just use the bufio structs > > throughout the code. Anyway, don't need to worry about this now. But > > what you've done is hack that should probably be cleaned up. > > This way, it's easy to swap the original block manager and dm-bufio. > > If I changed the names throughout the whole dm-thinp code, it would > conflict with any changes Joe may do. I agree with Mikulas here. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
