On Fri, Aug 19 2011 at 9:31am -0400, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18 2011 at 6:31pm -0400, > > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This all sounds good; get the locking interface in and I'll switch to > > > > bufio straight away. > > > > > > > > - Joe > > > > > > I uploaded bufio-based block manager at > > > http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/dm-thinp-bufio/. It > > > supports locks, but it defines new functions down_write_non_owner and > > > up_write_non_owner. > > > > dm-bufio.patch: > > drivers/md/Kconfig needs a more comprehensive description for DM_BUFIO's > > help. > > There is intentionally no description. If there is no description, this > option won't appear in "make menuconfig" menu. > > dm-bufio is selected automatically when some module that needs it is > configured. There is no need to select dm-bufio manually. Hmm, I wonder if it makes sense to remove DM_PERSISTENT_DATA's help description? (we already select DM_PERSISTENT_DATA when DM_THIN_PROVISIONING is selected -- but it is visible in menuconfig because it has a description). -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
