Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Yes, if you use LUKS. If you don't use LUKS, cryptsetup-luks behaves just > like cryptsetup. Hmmm... Old cryptsetup successful maping and mounting and cryptsetup-luks really weird "invalid argument" error doesn't seem like same behavior to me. There definetly is something I don't understand. But the real problem is that I just dont know what it is... After changing old cs for cs-luks - should all work as before without any changes in configuration of pam_mount or some changes are required? If changes are required - what should I check? > LUKS is not compatible with old style setup, but cryptsetup-luks can handle > both. Okay. Let's finish it :) I have an (recent - about 7 days old) unencrypted dd image of original partition on other harddrive. So, should I do this? - "synchronize" data from encrypted patrition with backup - forget about old cryptsetup and try to revert all changes to state before any encryption experiments - start all over with cryptsetup-luks I am getting to by little confused about how this cryptosetup stuff works :) And this seems to me now as the easiest way... -- S pozdravom *White Raven* Jabber: wra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ICQ: 134422337 SIP: 065940840@xxxxxxxxx http://www.visitors.sk/ RSS - http://www.visitors.sk/rss.xml --------------------------------------------------------------------- - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx
