Hi, On 08/26/2015 11:06 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:47:37AM -0700, vikas wrote: >> On 08/25/2015 11:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 12:09:50 AM, vikas wrote: >>>> the patch failed to apply, please rebase it to master. >>> >>> it's based on -next, I'm sure you can fix trivial conflicts yourself if you >>> need to apply it elsewhere. Do you have any other review comments ? >> >> Always rebase the patch on master. > > Development works against -next, not Linus' master: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/289013/ > > This is also noted here: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html > > Technically, you should work off of the respective subsystem tree (see > entries in MAINTAINERS). For MTD, this is also documented here: > > http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html > > In the end, most MTD patches get applied to l2-mtd.git, but l2-mtd.git > and linux-next.git should provide pretty similar MTD patching > experiences, as the former is included in the latter. Thanks Brian for these useful links, appreciate it. Rgds, Vikas > > Regards, > Brian > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
