On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:47:37AM -0700, vikas wrote: > On 08/25/2015 11:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 12:09:50 AM, vikas wrote: > >> the patch failed to apply, please rebase it to master. > > > > it's based on -next, I'm sure you can fix trivial conflicts yourself if you > > need to apply it elsewhere. Do you have any other review comments ? > > Always rebase the patch on master. Development works against -next, not Linus' master: https://lwn.net/Articles/289013/ This is also noted here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html Technically, you should work off of the respective subsystem tree (see entries in MAINTAINERS). For MTD, this is also documented here: http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html In the end, most MTD patches get applied to l2-mtd.git, but l2-mtd.git and linux-next.git should provide pretty similar MTD patching experiences, as the former is included in the latter. Regards, Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
