On 1/3/25 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03/01/2025 08:59, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
On 1/2/25 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/01/2025 18:50, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
The pwm-fan driver uses full PWM (255) duty cycle at startup, which may not
always be desirable because of noise or power consumption peaks, so add an
optional "default-pwm" property that can be used to specify a custom default
PWM duty cycle.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
That's v3, not v1. Also mention here shortly how Rob's comment is addressed.
It is? Then that wasn't from me, and I don't right away see anything
related on lore. Can you give me a pointer?
It is trivial to find your v1 and v2 in lore, so I assume you just reply
here to waste my time.
Sorry, I indeed apparently did send a v1/v2 ~1 year ago, I must be
getting old. I didn't look that far back in lore and for some reason I
don't have the changes in my local tree anymore, hence the reason for
recreating the commits yesterday and sending a new v1.
Looking at lore, v1 used target-pwm which Gunter suggested I changed to
default-rpm while explaining that it cannot be a generic property:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/b717da30-1d4c-4e09-b98c-4aa41a235234@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Which I then did as a v2, that then didn't get any additional feedback:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/3aa21a01-c994-4b36-8893-181e55a60c5e@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
So if we agree on default-pwm, then I can send an update (a v4!) with
the typo in the example fixed, OK?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
