On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 08:44:16AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 10/21/24 7:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 21/10/2024 13:16, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:17:59AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 09:49:59PM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Sandie Cao <sandie.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > +&camss {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&csi2rx {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > >
> > > You can drop these two, I marked them disabled in the common file
> > > earlier this week.
> > > 1
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&gmac0 {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&i2c0 {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&pwm {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&pwmdac {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +&spi0 {
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > >
> > > > If your board has to disable all these, then they should not have been
> > > > enabled in DTSI in the first place. Only blocks present and working in
> > > > the SoC (without amny external needs) should be enabled.
> > > >
> > > > I suggest to fix that aspect first.
> > >
> > > Eh, I don't think I agree. Having 5 disables here is a lesser evil than
> > > reproducing 90% of jh7110-common.dtsi or shunting a bunch of stuff
> > > around. Emil?
> >
> > Why reproducing 90%? Only enable would be here, no? Or you want to say
> > the common DTSI has things which do not exist?
>
> For what it's worth, I agree with Krzysztof. In the (long) cover
> page we pointed this out, and offered to do it in a followup patch.
> But if requested we can do it now.
>
> So in v6, a new patch would be inserted before the other three,
> and it would:
> - Remove the status = "okay" lines for those nodes that are not enabled
> in this new platform, in "jh7110-common.dtsi"
> - Add nodes where appropriate in:
> jh7110-milkv-mars.dts
> jh7110-pine64-star64.dts
> jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
> They'll look like this, to enable the ones disabled above, e.g.:
> &gmac0 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> &i2c0 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> You guys should come to agreement, but I do think what Krzysztof says
> is the right approach. And unless convinced otherwise, this will be
> what shows up in the next version of this series.
Ultimately, it is up to Emil how he wants these laid out.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
