On 21/10/2024 13:16, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:17:59AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 09:49:59PM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
>>> From: Sandie Cao <sandie.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +&camss {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&csi2rx {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>
> You can drop these two, I marked them disabled in the common file
> earlier this week.
> 1
>>> +
>>> +&gmac0 {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&i2c0 {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&pwm {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&pwmdac {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&spi0 {
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>
>> If your board has to disable all these, then they should not have been
>> enabled in DTSI in the first place. Only blocks present and working in
>> the SoC (without amny external needs) should be enabled.
>>
>> I suggest to fix that aspect first.
>
> Eh, I don't think I agree. Having 5 disables here is a lesser evil than
> reproducing 90% of jh7110-common.dtsi or shunting a bunch of stuff
> around. Emil?
Why reproducing 90%? Only enable would be here, no? Or you want to say
the common DTSI has things which do not exist?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
