Hello Heiko,
On 2024-10-10 22:24, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2024, 16:06:00 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
The way the introduced RK3399S SoC variant dtsi file (rk3399s.dtsi) is
named
diverges from the way the two already present RK3399 SoC variant dtsi
files
(rk3399-op1.dtsi and rk3399-t.dtsi) are named, but that simply follows
the
commonly used and/or the official RK3399 SoC variant names.
This is my only gripe with this ;-) .
I.e. looking through simple google, the rk3399t also seems to be
written
without "-" most of the time.
Though for me it would make the most sense to just go with "rk3399-s"
here for some sort of clear style between -s -t and -op1
Believe it or not, the inconsistency of having no dash before the "s"
has bothered me too. :) Let's add the dash, which I'll do in the v2.
