Hi Dragan, Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2024, 16:06:00 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic: > The way the introduced RK3399S SoC variant dtsi file (rk3399s.dtsi) is named > diverges from the way the two already present RK3399 SoC variant dtsi files > (rk3399-op1.dtsi and rk3399-t.dtsi) are named, but that simply follows the > commonly used and/or the official RK3399 SoC variant names. This is my only gripe with this ;-) . I.e. looking through simple google, the rk3399t also seems to be written without "-" most of the time. Though for me it would make the most sense to just go with "rk3399-s" here for some sort of clear style between -s -t and -op1 Heiko
