On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:11:51PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> Introduce a new compatible support in the Amlogic PWM driver.
>
> The PWM HW is actually the same for all SoCs supported so far. A specific
> compatible is needed only because the clock sources of the PWMs are
> hard-coded in the driver.
>
> It is better to have the clock source described in DT but this changes the
> bindings so a new compatible must be introduced.
>
> When all supported platform have migrated to the new compatible, support
> for the legacy ones may be removed from the driver.
>
> The addition of this new compatible makes the old ones obsolete, as
> described in the DT documentation.
>
> Adding a callback to setup the clock will also make it easier to add
> support for the new PWM HW found in a1, s4, c3 and t7 SoC families.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
After spending some brain cycles on this one I think I understood it.
Looks fine to me, I only considered questioning if the dev_warn_once is
too offensive.
b4 + git applied the patch just fine even without patch #4 of this
series. Would you be so kind to double check it works as intended?
BTW, b4 diagnosed:
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✗ [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to sm1
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221151154.26452-6-jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
+ Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
✗ BADSIG: DKIM/baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Is this only because it took me so long to reply, or is there a
configuration issue with the baylibre MTA?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
