On 09/04/2024 21:08, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > IPQ9574 has PCIe controllers which are almost identical to IPQ6018. > The only difference is that the "iface" clock is not required. > Document this difference along with the compatible string. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > index cf9a6910b542..1915bea580d3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3 > + - qcom,pcie-ipq9574 > - qcom,pcie-msm8996 > - qcom,pcie-qcs404 > - qcom,pcie-sdm845 > @@ -397,6 +398,37 @@ allOf: > - const: axi_m_sticky # AXI Master Sticky reset > - const: axi_s_sticky # AXI Slave Sticky reset > Where do you constrain the reg? Best regards, Krzysztof
